🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate atomic talks with the United States as long as it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared recent overtures had been made by mediators to resume talks with the US government. He claimed Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is walking a difficult course since Iran wishes not to appear to be acting from a position of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out stronger defensively and psychologically from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will never give up" – the main reason of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Previous Talks Abruptly Concluded

The prior phases of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump claiming the facilities had been eliminated. Afterward, EU nations used their authority to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Proposed

Tehran representatives said they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with US participation could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the deal to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Current Situation

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be resurrected in certain ways if discussions reopen.

The US president recently stated he had been getting signals that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Iran's diplomats say they are not yet receiving clear proposals from America either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of passivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, designed to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of international law, Araghchi stated the 12-day war demonstrated the clash could not be resolved by combat operations. He said the strikes began with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making faith challenging to reestablish.

Dialogue Stays the Primary Resolution

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly sought to dictate their demands during the talks. Diplomacy can still be viable and remains the final solution to resolve disputes, but its requirements, regulations and fundamentals must be followed."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and honor, they will obtain a answer in the same language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He stated: "We successfully passed this war. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and machinery, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have developed more powerful, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the face of this attack."