It is heartbreaking’: how thirty captive beluga whales have become pawns in row over animal welfare.
The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a worm. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a kind nature.
A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a tussle between a defunct facility, government authorities and animal rights activists.
But those closest to the whales say the impassioned controversy over their future often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been thoroughly researched by the people who see them each day.
After the federal government disallowed the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled attraction near Niagara Falls where they are kept warned to put them down unless the authorities pays for the cost of their survival. The nation’s marine resources official has rejected that demand, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable situation.
Intelligent Sea Creatures
Researchers say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and social skills point to they are highly cognitive mammals – something Kristy Burgess discovered personally.
She spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a position that required earning the trust of the sea creatures.
“Building up those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so magical and gratifying.”
The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless amazed by the details and quirks in their personalities. She cultivated a deep bond for two female belugas with opposing personalities.
“One whale chose me. Cleo required effort,” she said. “Each transformed the way I view relationships.”
Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions
Her interaction with the whales progressed against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their confinement.
During her three years at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, passed away. In total, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a number which the facility links to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say points to the inadequate care in which they were housed.
The park did not admit visitors to the public over the recent season, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand consequences of the cessation. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re in disrepair and not being repaired. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and navigate with chunks in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”
The park did not respond to a questionnaire, but in the past claimed: “The whales … get far superior medical attention and 24/7 attention than any person in the UK, or anywhere else.”
Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions
The former employee was dismissed from the park in the spring following the passing of a beluga, an sick beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the park thought details of the death were shared to the news outlets and she was let go soon after.
The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left her and staff members in despair. She says the facility’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any plans to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “immense staff”, equipment and specialized tools.
“There’s no way in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess advocates for requests for the whales to be taken promptly from the facility, with its failing enclosures and reduced personnel.
In recent months, Canada’s government official rejected a bid to send the whales to an overseas location.
“Granting the proposal would have meant a continued existence in captivity and a return to public entertainment,” the minister stated. “As Canadians, we know that whales are meant for the wild, not in pools for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing permit an relocation that would continue the situation these belugas have endured.”
But Burgess said the official’s statements reveal a more general misunderstanding of the facts of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.
“The society needs to understand these are whales that have existed solely in confinement and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t realize that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion
As decision makers struggle to find a answer, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of sustenance for local populations.
A planned sanctuary in the province of Nova Scotia, which recently received regulatory clearance, has shown to be contentious. The future location, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain optimistic that it could eventually represent a permanent resolution for some of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ future.
Different voices say the prospect of a refuge represents a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a workable approach in the coming months.
An official, head of the initiative, said the location will mimic the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales get from trainers, albeit in a more expansive environment. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|