🔗 Share this article

The Life Cycle of a Cult can be defined by distinct phases.

1. The Grand Vision

An inspiring figure or figureheads present an innovative concept pledging a solution for struggling players.

And so it goes. They’re getting ready to storm the compound in Australia. Tensions are rising. Signs of trouble appear from the sidelines. A lone figure, naked, anxious, the phrase ATTACKING MINDSET written on his body as a statement, has stumbled from the field and is removed in secrecy towards an inconclusive loan stint elsewhere.

Do you recall the beginning, when everything was fresh? The days of Bazball 1.0, of uninhibited aggression.

2. The Honeymoon Phase

Team architects offer a fresh beginning, a brighter tomorrow, camaraderie, redemption among a group with shared faith in the big idea.

What was this thing at first? Just men on a balcony basking in glory. Ink. Forearms. Determination. Peak performance vibes. Oh sure, England’s players insist they don’t use the label, amusingly because if it doesn’t exist, what was that spectacle?

Yet it’s clear the concept. It’s the batsman attempting a move so outrageous it’s beyond belief. It’s the adrenaline of Ben Stokes in his final form, a demeanor suggesting: thoughtful warrior, rugged appearance, untamed style, truly contemporary you half-expect to look down and find him positioned on the ground shirtless embracing nature.

It’s Ben Duckett continuing to have permission to talk in press conferences, resembling a cheerful animal formally attired, uttering phrases such as we are actively deconstructing the orange. Indeed, the vibe, for a significant period, was entirely positive.

3. The Growth Phase

Building period. Cohesion maintained through repetition of mantras. These ideas are often illogical as a loyalty check.

Am I alone? The reaction, the anger, the disappointment following the initial loss seems too strong, too much. England batted badly on the field, as is typical there. They were torn apart in the field for a couple of hours as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, manipulated by Travis Head playing aggressively but smarter, adaptive to conditions, an athlete shining with a kind of light around him.

Currently, we see the criticism, the frustration, the sense of English Test cricket as a disgrace. The feeling seems to be that England don’t just need to lose, they must be humbled, to be purged, flame-throwered, defeated via traditional methods of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the low-fi orthodoxies of Scott Boland, out there celebrating his wickets with a bashful smile as if receiving a rewarding prize. How will they respond?

4. The Backlash Phase

Issues emerge from failures in the plan. However, faults are ignored. It starts to feed on hostility externally.

The fact remains, a few days before from the second Test, we have now reached a critical juncture in the journey of this movement. England could quite easily win overseas through aggressive play. Probably, they could lose just as quickly. In case of defeat it seems we could be witnessing the decline.

Ahead of this, several aspects to consider on the topic. Previously, back in those heady early days, of optimism and energy, I wrote an article labeling it a movement. People were very angry, which was helpful since it’s clear how to confirm that it’s not a closed group is if supporters react defensively rejecting criticism of the beliefs.

The developments lately is just as interesting. It seems that hating Bazball is now the trend. Online outrage is widespread, critical analysts, images of frustrated followers overseas cheated out of three days of cricket, like a room full of timeshare owners seeking justice.

Meanwhile, there is the broader context of Australia’s more nuanced more culturally hard-wired exasperation with the aggressive tourists, stating, your cherished traditions and have honed as part of your identity from the opposition, well, it’s all a bit of a gag in the end old boy.

This is the core issue. It’s all cults. Bazball was a cult as the game has its own culture. Or rather, the sport in England is closed, a clique, a garden party, a restricted environment with centuries of ceremonial past behind it. Historically, this was where entry is limited. It’s the imperial sport of England, the early image-makers. And guess what, Britain is itself a cult, a series of esoteric hierarchies, a royal family remains.

The players have been sealed up in this system since childhood. In trying to escape from it, to create a less brutal environment, they are mirroring their upbringing, creating another a bubble, a limited community, however with a new team and a leader encouraging individuality as long as yourself is quite a lot like myself.

Stay present. Run towards the danger. However much you change, things stay similar.

Reflecting on this, now is the time to offer compassion for the movement, to recognize its positives, that are numerous. What does it represent? Promoting liberation. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with