🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.